tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5592514.post1941493509332281994..comments2023-10-24T03:46:41.971-07:00Comments on Contingencies: Jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11567400697675996283noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5592514.post-14438167899540100172009-11-08T13:46:41.190-08:002009-11-08T13:46:41.190-08:00Hey JH.
I might have prefaced the comment with an...Hey JH.<br /><br />I might have prefaced the comment with an intro. but also realized that loyal Contingencies fans would click the link and make the inference (--well, most would, excepting the mormon and/or baptist cyberstalkers) .<br /><br />I'm not really a Zizekean (though respect his Hegelian aspects, a bit) and find his objections to Rawls a bit ...oh..... conclusionary, or lightweightJhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11567400697675996283noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5592514.post-7402006605214681372009-11-08T11:25:46.328-08:002009-11-08T11:25:46.328-08:00this is sort of interesting
the rise of special in...this is sort of interesting<br />the rise of special interest group envy and hatred...aspects of that permeate church politics these days<br /><br />i know so little of zizek and rawls and all the modern 20th century theorists that it would be difficult for me to appreciate what they're really looking at<br /><br />i find it interesting that you spoke to zizek on the phone<br /><br />the lastjhhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10043530995274885830noreply@blogger.com