tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5592514.post8569265667573379796..comments2023-10-24T03:46:41.971-07:00Comments on Contingencies: Jhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11567400697675996283noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5592514.post-45131591738484208182009-09-27T08:11:27.026-07:002009-09-27T08:11:27.026-07:00Yes, but they could not actually call it Evil, cou...Yes, but they could not actually call it Evil, could they, except in a colloquial sense. And why not be a Madoff, if you can get away with it? <br /><br />I'm not necessarily suggesting Darwinists or atheists are more corrupt or shark-like than believers or non-Darwinists, but I do think--contra some of the neo-atheist crowd--that religious considerations, like "usury is a sin" (at Jhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11567400697675996283noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-5592514.post-22908644959815973752009-09-27T07:16:23.289-07:002009-09-27T07:16:23.289-07:00What Darwinian materialists would say of usury pro...What Darwinian materialists would say of usury probably depends on the political inclinations of siad materialists.One Browhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/11938816242512563561noreply@blogger.com