Wednesday, June 08, 2005
On Power, Russell
"The orthodox economists, as well as Marx, who in this respect agreed with them, were mistaken in supposing that economic self-interest could be taken as the fundamental motive in the social sciences. The desire for commodities, when separated from power and glory, is finite, and can be fully satisfied by a moderate competence. The really expensive desires are not dictated by a love of material comfort. Such commodities as a legislature rendered subservient by corruption, or a private picture gallery of Old Masters selected by experts, are sought for the sake of power or glory, not as affording comfortable places in which to sit. When a moderate degree of comfort is assured, both individuals and communities will pursue power rather than wealth: they may seek wealth as a means to power, or they may forgo an increase of wealth in order to secure an increase of power, but in the former case as in the latter their fundamental motive is not economic.
This error in orthodox and Marxist economics is not merely theoretical, but is of the greatest practical importance, and has caused some of the principal events of recent times to be misunderstood. It is only by realizing that love of power is the cause of the activities that are important in social affairs that history, whether ancient or modern, can be rightly interpreted."
Russell, On Power
Posted by J at 12:22 PM
- ► 2011 (249)
- ► 2010 (266)
- ► 2009 (184)
- ► 2008 (146)
- ► 2007 (154)
- ► 2006 (69)
- Quine's Two Dogmas of Empiricism Quine's Two Dogm...
- Economic equity and conservatism If conservatism ...
- Feds crack down on medical pot The Baronial Mast...
- Ay Laddy Contingencies is not usually one for t...
- On Power, Russell "The orthodox economists, as ...
- The Jacko the Chester Show Another episode in the...
- Prospect Theory 101 and the Irrational Man Standar...
- The McSynthetic A Priori and Fries please Here's ...
- ▼ June (8)
- ► 2004 (28)