perps of the LDS
Ted Bundy--Bundius!--was an LDS boy (why is that not surprising). They forgot to include Joseph Smith hisself.
Mo' mormonic phunn
the Mittster
Tuesday, May 18, 2010
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Custom Search
Blog Archive
-
▼
2010
(266)
-
▼
May
(22)
- Hobbes' ghost
- Dennis Hopper RIP
- Aynnie-wood
- Dial M for Movieland
- Bach-tag
- Rand as in Aynd?
- e-Meg--non voter for 28 years
- Mormonics, cont.
- Ahhnuld-nomix
- Amgen ouch--Palmdale to Big Bear
- Pancake pater-noster
- Sabado GIGANTE
- Walker Percy's Weirdest Book
- The Yarnell Kid
- Dishonoring J.P. Stevens
- Phunion
- eMeg Whit-Goldman
- Baron Von Schwarzenegger....tweets
- NDOP, cont.--Rev. Melville's sermon
- Decid grazias a Benito Juárez
- Sunday Morning
- National day of ~(prayer)
-
▼
May
(22)
1 comment:
I loved your lack of "?" in "why is that not surprising," and will follow suit in dropping the "?" when the question is rhetorical, ONLY.
Also loved your use of 'hisself', since I think it sounds better than 'himself' and I'm not an ebonic speaker or from Nottinghamshire, England! (on the whole).
L. J. Kramer, elsewhere, has tried to convince me that 'himself' is short for 'him self', i.e. really 'him' with the 'self' as emphatic. His point: it does not mean HIS self, but 'him', himself. The older use was 'same-self', apparently. But I still like 'hisself'.
Post a Comment